There was very little game talk this week. It was mostly a social week Players focused on building up relationships and strategy within their close groupings.
Let us know your power ranking in the comments below.
(Last weeks values in parenthesis)
|
Entertainment |
Social |
Strategy |
Bonus |
Total |
James |
5(4) |
4 |
3(4) |
0 |
12 |
Just laying low building up your social game. Your stories about gizmo and non stop fun on the feeds ensure a strong entertainment score. |
|||||
Austin |
3 |
5(3) |
4(3) |
-1(+1) |
11(10) |
Playing a solid social game. Austin should be a huge target but only one person mentions him as one. -1 kissing Liz |
|||||
Liz |
4 |
3 |
3 |
+1(+1) |
11 |
You won HOH, put up your alliances main target, no sneaky plans no big lies. Winning HOH and POV can substitute for strategic foresight this week +1 |
Steve |
3 |
3 |
5(3) |
0 |
11(9) |
Steve is playing a couple angles, Working on Johnnymac, Vanessa and Austin. This is putting him in the centre of a lot of game. His blind spot are the goblins. |
|||||
Julia |
4 |
4(3) |
2 |
0(+1) |
10(10) |
Juju working the social angle, getting in good with the house. Being a very small target the jackpot is becoming further out of reach but the path to the finals is becoming clearer. |
|||||
Meg |
3(4) |
5(5) |
1 |
+1(+1) |
10(11) |
If someone takes you to final 2 they will win. You’ll make it far, nobody mentions you as a target. If Allies listen to her game talk they will experience brain death +1 sometimes temporary (Jackie) other times permanent (James). |
|||||
JohnnyMac |
3 |
3(2) |
4(3) |
0(-1) |
10(8) |
Jmac has lost most his key allies, only Steve remains. Strategic in his thinking with a suffering social game he’s gotta win Comps. |
|||||
Vanessa |
2(3) |
2 |
5 |
(0) |
9(10) |
Still a dangerous player but has lost much of their influence in the house to really be effective. You’ll have to win a HOH to rebuild some relationships. |
|||||
Becky |
3 |
2 |
2 |
+1(0) |
8(6) |
You’ve participated in Big BRother 17, Out played and betrayed. Relying on the goblins f***d you. +1 your toe |
There’s three main categories, Entertainment value, Social Skillz and Strategy/game with each category ranging from 1-5 with a 0 value being used for exceptional cases. A bonus category is also added worth 3 points for those special cases that don’t fit the 3 main categories.
1/3 – Entertainment
0- You’re not entertaining – I turn the feeds off when you’re on
1- Offensive, Rude, unlikable or flat out boring COULD be SOME words that might describe your behaviour on the feeds
2- Maybe you’re laying too low. Right now everyone on OBB is joking about not knowing your name
3- Neutral
4- You’re a likable person and showing it on the feeds
5- You’re making these feeds Very fun to watch
1/3 – Social game
0 – Your social game is non existent go back to blogging in a basement
1 – Most of the house dislikes you. You’ll see yourself a target soon
2- You’re building some relationships but not enough to keep your ass safe if you or our close few friends don’t win a comp
3- Neutral
4- You’re building a lot of relationships but also some enemies
5- Most if not all the house likes you. Nobody has thrown your name out there as a target yet
1/3 – Strategy
0- Strategy .. HUH? what does that mean
1- You have a short term plan that will get you by the next 20 minutes
2- Your plan is to to make it to Jury to get the stipend
3- Neutral
4-You have a Short term or Long term plan and a couple ideas plans on how to execute it
5- You have a clear plan for the short or long term and a clear plan to execute
Bonus
+/- 1-3 points can be awarded to players that has done something incredibly awesome or stupid. Maybe they turned their game around after being universally hated or squandered away a strategic asset because they couldn’t keep their mouths shuts..
A little glitch. I’m logged in as SImon and can’t change it. It’s JJtoWin here, saying that Becky should score higher, she’s done much more than just “participate”. She started Vanessa’s down slide and has helped JMac progress. She’s great at comps and she’s handled both her HOH humbling and being on the block with good grace and ownership. She was premature in trying for Vanessa, but ballsy. Meg scores higher? Come on now…
I agree with almost all of these, I just think (for what it’s worth) that Vanessa’s strategy mark needs to be lowered now. She failed to adapt her strategy mid game and has made herself a target.
This may be a double. If so, sorry. Becky should score higher. She’s done more than just “participate”. She caused the Vanessa down slide and has helped JMac’s game (and I’m good with that). She has handled both her HOH humbling and being “blocked” with good grace and ownership. Not to mention her comp record. Meg scores higher? Really?
“If Allies listen to her game talk they will experience brain death +1 sometimes temporary (Jackie) other times permanent (James).”
Perfect.